What games?

 Had a good talk with my colleague and supervisor about my plans for my thesis, and we made a tight schedule to get things going. And he came with some good input, and most important was that I need to decide what my empirical material will be, and to do that fast. So what games do I want to write about and how should I think about these choices? I have a short-list of possible games, but it's too varied in many ways. Some are on consoles, others on computers, some are old other are new. And I realised that I will need to write about my chosen games a lot. It's not a good idea to compare and talk about many different games all through the text. So right now my list is The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild and Super Mario Odyssey. Two recent and very well received mainstream Nintendo games. One open-world exploration, the other level-based and almost linear but full of references to various types of gameplay, very meta at times. Two games aimed at kids but with a large adult fanbase. Both from long series of games.

The pros are many, they are easy to play, they are well known, they are typical for their kind of game, they are "classics" for a lack of a better word. They are also examples on two different game worlds. Similar enough to make for good comparisons and dissimilar enough to cover a lot of game design choices.

The cons are also many. I have to choose not to talk about game history or historical development of technique. I don't write about what is often seen as "serious gaming"; the big titels for PS5, Xbox or PC; no Read Dead Redemption, Witcher, Fortnight, Minecraft, FIFA etc. I can do that another time. There are of course more thing in games than in the ones I'm thinking about choosing, but I can't really write one book about everything.

The main concern here is the question "Will this choice produce an interesting and useful investigation?" and I think it will. It's easy to explain why I compare these two games (same company, platform, audience and time), whereas a comparison between say Mario Cart 8 (Nintendo Switch and Wii U 2009-) and Doom II (PC 1994) would be a very troubled one - there is no reason for why those two specific games from all of game history should be my subject.

In art historical terms I think of it like comparing works from two artists working in the same time and place. It's a more robust starting point.

But I need to play a lot of Super Mario Odyssey now, I'm not at all as far into it as I am after many years with BotW. And perhaps there is an article about Mario Cart 8 somewhere in me.

Super Mario Odyssey


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Check-in with Max

Image
 I just had a meeting with my supervisor, who had read my manuscript to this point, and it went very well. I do not know why, but I always think that meetings like that end in disaster, along the lines of "This is terrible, what the hell are you doing?" but that never happens. I got good feedback and it was great to see how well he understood my text so far. He had a few points that I really need to address. One of them is my tendency to use a lot of empty intensifiers that just need to be edited out. No problem, I know they are there, but they always seem so reasonable when I first write them, and then I see later that they do not do anything or even weaken my text. Another thing is two long paragraphs describing my game examples, which are too long and need to be closer to my arguments. This is more difficult; I wrote them because I know art historians do not play games, so I wanted to do a thorough introduction early on; but he's right and there must be a way to shor...
Read more

Talking about my work with my supervisor today

Image
 Today it was time to report to my doctoral supervisor Max. He asked me to summarize the three main parts of my text, and we talked about them and some more specific problems in some chapters, as well as writing techniques. All in all, it was a very good conversation. I wish I'd had more time to revise now, especially since I'd taken the whole Easter week off to do it, but unfortunately I was tired for a few days so I didn't really rewrite much. But I did have time to read my text and think about its structure and how to get a better flow in the argument. And this check-in was a continuation of that, so I'm hoping to get back on track with rewriting. We're also planning the date and opponent for my final seminar in the fall, so the goal is getting a little closer. I'm pretty sure I'll have to spend a lot of the summer rewriting, but that's to be expected.
Read more

What am I writing about?

Image
 There is a pleasure in being in a game world, an escapist pleasure of being somewhere else, in a more interesting world where you have more agency and more capabilities. This pleasure is not new, nor specific to games, on the contrary most art has this potential for escapism; paintings, novels, theatre, opera and cinema have all been mediaforms where other worlds have been crafted. Games have one more thing than the predecessors; games are interactive and can at times provide a very open structure for how to perceive oneself to be inside these other worlds. A painted world is static but lets the viewer wander over it's surface. A narrative story is linear and we must walk through it on the path given by it's creator. Games can be very open and allow for many different paths through a world, and the gamer has agency in it.  So I will look at the effect of being in the game world with a phenomenological eye and comparing it to ways of being in worlds made through painting, scen...
Read more